Don’t lie — you know you were waiting for it. You knew that as soon as Stephen Colbert was lifted from The Colbert Reportto the position of late-night royalty — and the open mockery of the failure of #CancelColbert started in earnest on Twitter — the countdown had begun to Suey Park’s official response. You knew it was coming, and you knew it would be gloriously unhinged, because if there’s one thing Park has proven to us it’s that A) she’s her own worst enemy, and B) she never had the necessary “Carrie‘s Mother” figure in her life to warn her, “They’re all gonna laugh at you!”
Maybe it mitigates some of the damage Park is doing to her own cause that she just might be one of the least self-aware people on the planet. She’s someone not just completely devoid of humor but seemingly unable to understand that the only reason serious people are pretending to give her opinions any credence at all anymore is that they draw page-views from the thousands who can’t help but stop and gawk at the trainwreck. Case in point: Time online giving her and her collaborator in #CancelCobert, Eunsong Kim, a nice open forum to tilt at the windmill of “whiteness” once again, rub everyone not named Suey Park and Eunsong Kim the wrong way, and further devalue what should have all along been a noble effort to draw attention to the issue of ethnic stereotyping in pop culture.
Park’s statement is pretty brief, but as is her wont, she manages to cram a lot of aggression and plenty of radical activist buzzwords into a small space:
The marginalization of other voices is now complete.
The cross-promotion of more white male celebrities prove it: The entertainment industry has perfected the development of white, cis, straight, male characters. The marginalization of “other voices” — except when those “others” are brought in only to aid in the cheap punch line of a joke — is complete. This is aggression that we do not have to accept. We will protest this until it ends.
Many dismissed the protest we undertook last month with #CancelColbert, a hashtag we set up in response to a blatantly racist Tweet about Asians from the Colbert show’s account.
We think people are surprised to see that their monolithic view of Asian Americans as a model minority is being challenged. We are not the problem. Your stereotypes and narrow roles for us are the problem.
Some Asian Americans were quick to protect the myth of our being a model minority. They disowned us and said we do not speak for them. We agree. Asian Americans are not a monolithic group, and we do not speak for anyone but ourselves.
Others wanted to silence us immediately. Young Asian American women, with little institutional power, are not supposed to be this loud. Our voices are not expected to be raised — and when they’re raised, they’ve not meant to travel.
Our age and appearance have led to us being infantilized — and therefore our political ideals have been treated as incoherent and immature. We are accused of being ungrateful sidekicks of honorary whiteness. It is baffling that we would reject this role to instead critique white supremacy.
We are supposed to express appreciation for our honorary whiteness by remaining silent and accepting breadcrumbs in return. But accepting the role of model minority only reaffirms the logic of racism. We reject our honorary whiteness.
As women of color, we are rarely heard unless we bend to the conduct codes of whiteness — a way of speaking and operating that massages power. If we reject these politics of respectability, we are easily dismissed and slotted into the crazy/angry Asian archetype.
Our role in mainstream media is the perpetual race commentator — unable to exist in a way that isn’t reactionary and defensive to whiteness. We were only heard when we responded to a beloved white man.
People seem to think that what we’re calling for is fake and overly positive representation of our own minority and others — which would amount to a humorless landscape. That is not what we want.
The irony is that we want complexity, we want nuance, we want critical representations of race, gender, class, sexuality, disability, and more. But we reject the idea of representation being our end goal. We will not mute who we are in order to be accepted into the mainstream. If our liberation is dependent on getting our oppressors to humanize us, then we have already lost.
The main thing we’ve learned from #CancelColbert, and the outcome we now see as Colbert is elevated once again, is that the belittling the voices, activism, and writing of women of color is a profitable venture.
There is so much to gain by correcting us, dismissing us, rewriting our narratives. Duly noted, white, neoliberal heteropatriarchy — we will be sure to march forward with new tactics and strategies. We are not accidental or frivolous; we are intentional and unrelenting. We do not depend on a beloved white man to begin, end, or continue our protest.
This is a distinction between liberalism and radicalism — between reform and the dismantling of structures.
We will never apologize. Apologize for settler colonialism. Apologize for anti-blackness. Apologize for orientalism.
So there’s that.
By the way, the title of this little manifesto, as repeated in the piece itself, is “We Will Protest This Until It Ends.”
As you can see, that mission statement has worked out great so far. Just ask Colbert.
Chez Pazienza was the beating heart of The Daily Banter, sadly passing away on February 25, 2017. His voice remains ever present at the Banter, and his influence as powerful as ever.