Skip to main content

The Presider vs The Decider

  • Author:
  • Updated:

By Ben Cohen

Andrew Sullivan contrasts Bush and Obama's presidential style:

At times, Bush's indifference to the system around him bordered on a

kind of political autism. And so one of the oddest aspects of Bush's

presidency was his tendency to declare things as if merely saying them

as president could make them so. The model was clear and dramatically

intensified by wartime: the president pronounced; Congress anemically

responded; the base rallied. At the start, it felt like magic, but as

reality slipped through the fast-eroding firewall of reckless spending

and military misadventure, Bush's authority disappeared all the more

quickly - because his so-certain predictions were so obviously wrong.

The Decider had no response to this. He just had to keep deciding and

asserting, to less and less effect, that he was right all along. Hence

the excruciating final months. Within a democratic system, we had

replicated all the comedy and tragedy of cocooned authoritarianism.

Now look at Obama. What the critics misread in his Inaugural was its
classical structure. He was not running any more. He was presiding. His
job was not to rally vast crowds, but to set the scene for the broader
constitutional tableau to come to life. Hence the obvious shock of some
Republican Congressman at debating with a president who seemed
interested in actual conversation, aas opposed to pure politics. Last
Tuesday, there were none of the bold declarative predictions of the
Second Bush Inaugural - and none of the slightly creepy Decider
idolatry. Yes, Obama set some very clear directional goals, but the key
difference is what came next: a window of invitation. The invitation is
to the other co-equal branches of government to play their part; and
for the citizenry to play its. This is an understanding of the
president as one node in a constitutional order - not a near-dictator
outside and superior to other branches of government. It is a return to
traditional constitutional order. And it is rooted in a traditional,
small-c conservative understanding of the presidency.