Loading

Posts Tagged ‘Piers Morgan’

Stay Classy, Assholes

Chez Pazienza · January 29,2013
Screen Shot 2013-01-29 at 12.41.26 PM

Neil Heslin

I’ve brought this up once before here but it’s worth repeating right now. Several years back, I got into a minor online battle with a gun rights group called the Virginia Citizens Defense League after it decided to hold a pro-gun rally within driving distance of the Virginia Tech campus just one month, almost to the day, after the shooting there that killed 32 people. My argument, made with a whole hell of a lot of four-letter words, was that it showed an almost staggering level of insensitivity to throw a heavily armed frat party — and trust me, that’s exactly what this thing was — while right outside your doors standing silent vigil were the families of several of the kids shot dead at Virginia Tech, families still freshly in mourning and learning to cope with the loss of their loved ones.

I understood that if you believed that guns weren’t to blame for the V-Tech massacre then you likely saw nothing wrong with having a big gun-lusty circle jerk while the wounds from the attack were still very much open. But to strike a pose of mocking defiance against gun violence victims — men and women you inexplicably considered your oppressors and enemies — instead of at least taking the opportunity to acknowledge their suffering and what should be its effect on the tone of your event wasn’t just lousy PR, it was practically sociopathic. My overall point was that anyone that callous and cruel shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a gun — that he was the last person on earth you wanted to see armed.

There have probably been plenty of occasions where determined and single-minded activists on the left have been grossly insensitive to the suffering of others simply because those people happened to be their political adversaries. But I swear, I can’t remember a period in history when I’ve seen more of the kind of despicable, inexcusably monstrous bullying being dished out regularly in the name of crushing any who dare to oppose a political position than what’s come from the right in recent years. If it’s something conservatives hold as an article of unwavering faith, they’ll fight to the death to make sure nobody can even approach the subject from the opposing side without being utterly obliterated, whether that person is, say, a war hero, or a private citizen who has the temerity to publicly suggest that insurance companies should cover birth control for women — or a guy whose son was just killed in an unspeakable gun rampage at a Connecticut elementary school and who is now daring to speak out in favor of sensible gun safety legislation.

If you haven’t yet seen the video clip of gun enthusiasts heckling Neil Heslin, the father of 6-year-old Sandy Hook shooting victim Jesse Lewis, last night in Hartford, Connecticut, get ready to want to put your fist through a wall. It’s so sickening, so profoundly disrespectful that I can’t imagine anyone with a soul defending it. There honestly isn’t language strong enough to describe the kind of mentality it must take to try to overpower the voice of a man who’s holding a picture of his dead child in his hands while he’s speaking publicly, fragilely about his personal pain. And to do it simply because you’re that obsessed with being able to own as many guns of as many shapes and sizes as your heart desires without ever having to meet an ounce of resistance from anyone is fucking insane. Completely fucking insane. Again, if your gun lust is so intense — if it’s tied so inextricably to your masculinity and your sense of self — that you’re willing to attempt to confront and bully someone like a Neil Heslin, it proves incontrovertibly that you should not be allowed anywhere near a weapon. You’re not mature enough, disciplined enough, and level-headed enough to be given the awesome privilege and responsibility of owning a firearm. You’re dangerous.

It’s generally entertaining to watch the desperate tribalist flailing of a movement which is intellectually and morally bankrupt, mostly because that flailing is the direct result of its being deprived of air. It’s what happens when people who’ve been able to have their way for so long that it’s become the status quo for them suddenly realize that their authority is finally meeting a serious challenge and is slipping through their fingers. But the heartless, brainless, shameless joke that passes for conservatism these days still has a certain amount of pull with millions of Americans and therefore when its angry, robotic adherents cross the line it deserves to be pointed out and publicly shunned.

The usually virile pro-gun lobby has had a truly rough month-and-a-half PR-wise — and the beauty of it is that it’s all the pro-gun lobby’s fault. It miscalculated both public sentiment and its own formerly Jedi-like powers at virtually every turn and in doing so made itself into a laughingstock and a walking billboard for why guns shouldn’t be in the hands of every single person who demands them. From Wayne LaPierre’s unthinkably tone-deaf rant about adding more guns to schools, to Alex Jones’s full-on furious-white-guy meltdown on Piers Morgan, to the NRA’s repugnant and logic-free ad questioning the security provided to President Obama’s daughters, to a misguided and unsurprisingly violent Gun Appreciation Day held the same weekend as MLK day and the Obama inauguration, to, maybe most Keystone Kops uproariously, a campaign that tried to reach out to minorities by tying in Django Unchained and making the claim that guns in the hands of black men and women — traditionally the last people conservatives want to see armed — would’ve prevented slavery, the end of December and all of January was a non-stop comedy of errors for the “Cold Dead Hands” crowd.

And now this: heckling a grieving father.

I can’t imagine how these people are going to top this one, but I have no doubt they’ll come up with something. They always have in the past.

Subscribe

avatar

Chez Pazienza's feed

Enter email below:

Escaped Mental Patient Appears on CNN’s Piers Morgan Show

Bob Cesca · January 09,2013
alex_jones_cnn_280

alex_jones_cnnThere’s a cost-benefit conundrum when it comes to showcasing right-wing yayhoos and fakers in the broader news media: do we help to debunk their extremist views and therefore undermine their popularity, or do we give them more attention and therefore fuel and augment their popularity?

Usually, I err on the side of exposing them, but yesterday I posted the video of Piers Morgan interviewing conspiracy theorist and paleoconservative weeble Alex Jones, and I criticized Morgan for elevating Jones’ apoplectic Cuckoo’s Nest pro-gun kneejerkery to a worldwide audience. My thought at the time was that out of the entire menu of conservative entertainment talkers, Jones is the one who’s probably the biggest performance artist of them all, and, as such, he’s not a serious participant in the discourse. He’s a side-show freak and contributes nothing of substance, I thought, and therefore should’ve been ignored.

In hindsight, I was wrong.

Sure, Jones is a faker insofar as he amplifies his views and showman personality for a greater impact in an overcrowded online and terrestrial radio universe. He’s clearly mentally ill, too, but mentally ill like a fox. The sad thing is that every fringe, screechy, alpha-dog talking point he shouted on CNN the other night is actually boilerplate gun fetishist orthodoxy. As such, and in retrospect, Morgan did a fantastic job exposing this nonsense to the world as a means of proving just how unhinged and radical the core pro-gun movement really is.

Alex Jones is the Proto-Glenn-Beck. In fact, Beck horked much of his conspiracy theory act from Jones. But they’re both really good at acting like googly-eyed freaks, shouting and spitting venom — picking fights and mercilessly hammering their enemies for ratings and financial gain via the right-wing market segment. Borrowing from the time-tested playbook of Bible Belt televangelists and early Meltdown Artists like Morton Downey Jr., Jones knows exactly what he has to do in order to grab the attention of fans and enemies alike: play to their fear and paranoia, while wrapping himself in the Constitution. Ironic, isn’t it, that Jones’ latest campaign is aimed at convincing the U.S. government to silence Morgan and his anti-gun position via deportation. Hardly a position worthy of at least two clauses of the First Amendment.

There aren’t many other radio cranks who are more effective at playing the role of the psychotic prophet. On CNN, Jones knew precisely what would give his tinfoil-swaddled disciples their first real boners while watching from within their creepy Buffalo Bill dungeons.

His agenda wasn’t to discuss the finer points of gun control. His agenda was to promote Alex Jones and to emasculate Piers Morgan. And so he went all roid-rage on Morgan, frantically waving around printouts from his Infowars website and rarely withdrawing his pudgy pointed finger from Morgan’s personal space. But nothing he said was particularly new. It didn’t have to be. With Morgan’s go-ahead, Jones knew he could go all R.P. MacMurphy on the air — ejaculating from his polyp-infested larynx the same xenophobic, backwoods, militia, rebellion, Godwin’s Law simpleton horsecrap that could be easily dredged up in a million other places online and elsewhere. Guns don’t kill people! Nazis! 1776! The Second Amendment is about revolution! Foreigners! Real Americans!

That’s why it was so important for Morgan to showcase Jones on television.

And Jones didn’t disappoint. You don’t need to be plugged into the political discourse or schooled in gun control policy to notice that when he started shouting about Morgan being “a hatchet man for the New World Order,” or about 1776 and “lemmings,” he was almost cartoonishly funny and self-satirical. Unlike Beck or even Limbaugh, Jones lacks authenticity and seems more like an Andy-Kaufman-esque prankster. Frankly, if I was an opponent of gun control, I would’ve been embarrassed by Jones, just as I’m embarrassed when I see a nutbag hurl a shoe at George W. Bush or when Code Pink assaults a Republican with blood-red paint at a congressional hearing. Here’s to hoping Jones had the same effect on gun control opponents and responsible gun owners alike. I wouldn’t doubt it. Hell, Glenn Beck was embarrassed by Jones and spent the first 15 minutes of his show yesterday explaining why.

Mainstream America needs to see the poison that’s roiling and festering in the deep, dark places of the world. Alex Jones is deeply nested in those dark places, and Morgan exposed him to the light of day for once. He’s the King of Underground Paranoiacs. With his show appearing on 70 stations nationwide, he influences a lot of people; people with guns and plans and who don’t think Jones is cartoonish at all. None of this is to say he should be shut down or censored.  Just the opposite. It never hurts to know who’s calling the shots for the fringe, just as long as Jones and others aren’t given unchallenged latitude in the process, and from what I could tell Morgan came to the debate well-informed, but also willing to let Jones hang himself as an extremist and a liar who, like so many others in the conservative entertainment complex, is willing to exploit the naivete, fear and paranoia of his audience.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Subscribe

avatar

Bob Cesca's feed

Enter email below:

Christine O’Donnell Walks Off Piers Morgan After ‘Difficult’ Questions

Ben Cohen · August 18,2011

In the ever splintering cultural landscape of American politics, politicians believe it is their right not to talk to press they don't like or answer questions they find difficult. Sarah Palin essentially set the precedent for this behavior after joining McCain on the Republican presidential ticket in '08, failing so miserably in her initial exposure to the media that she then refused to hold a press conference or engage in hardball interviews ever again.

Now we have mindbendingly ignorant products of the bible belt like Michele Bachmann and Christine O'Donnell parading themselves as politicians, again refusing to engage with the 'enemy' (ie. the liberal press). Just watch Christine O'Donnell's ridiculous reaction to Piers Morgan asking her questions about topics she wrote about in her book:

At some point this game has to stop – politicians have a duty to answer questions regardless of where they come from or what they are about. After all, they receive a salary from the tax payer and their duty is to them, not their careers.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Subscribe

avatar

Ben Cohen's feed

Enter email below:

Copyright © 2013 BanterMediaGroup, L.L.C. All rights reserved.