The NRA Hipster is Back to Tell Us that Guns Are Just "Bits of Plastic and Metal"

You might recall our coverage of Billy's previous NRA effort in which he explained how gun classes should be taught in schools.
Avatar:
Author:
Publish date:
Social count:
133
You might recall our coverage of Billy's previous NRA effort in which he explained how gun classes should be taught in schools.
nra-hipster

The National Rifle Association's resident waif-like hipster, Billy Johnson, is back with another hilariously simplistic video. You might recall our coverage of Billy's previous NRA effort in which he explained how gun classes should be taught in schools. But that wasn't the craziest part. Billy also proposed that the U.S. government should subsidize gun purchases under the blanket idea that "everybody gets a gun" -- and free government ammo, too. Nothing says keeping Big Government in check like a proposal for a gun subsidy entitlement program. Yes, the NRA is going socialist, but only when it comes to genuflecting before its gods in the corporate firearm industry. We can't possibly allow government to subsidize health insurance, but give all you can to gun manufacturers.

That brings us to "Episode 93" of NRA News, titled "De-mystifying Guns," and the return of Billy Johnson.

In this installment, Billy elaborates on the classic NRA bumper-sticker slogan: "Guns don't kill people. People kill people." Only, he never actually mentions it. Call it the "Guns don't kill people" idea but repackaged for the new generation -- to the X-TREME! In other words, he wonders out loud why society is so afraid of open-carry firearms.

I think it has everything to do with our irrational, media fed, hysterical fear of guns. Somehow, we have completely dehumanized gun violence and have instead, humanized guns.

Uh-huh. So, the people who insist they have a God-given right to open-carry firearms because invisible enemies will attack them inside a Target or a Starbucks -- the people with irrational, conspiratorial fears about federal goon squads confiscating their semi-automatic retail products, products which they've imbued with sacred, providential qualities, are telling us that gun control activists are dealing in irrational behavior? Yeah. Now that right there is some authentic frontier projection.

He continued by mocking gun control supporters.

"Guns kill. Guns strike fear. Guns intimidate." Seriously?

Well, yes, seriously. Isn't this the entire reason for open-carry firearms -- to kill, scare and intimidate would-be criminals? Otherwise, why open-carry them? If firearms aren't meant to provoke these reactions, why not stash them in camouflage man-purses or fanny packs or whatever the hell conceal-carry gun owners do? Something tells me Billy hasn't completely thought this one through.

And then he delivered what could be the most insane thing ever said about firearms.

They're just bits of plastic and metal.

In the most simplistic, basic terms, I suppose they are. But such a ludicrous description totally glosses over what firearms can do. Obviously. The fact is, firearms also expel bits of metal at a velocity faster than the speed of sound. These bits of metal inflict unspeakable violence upon the human body. While, yes, they typically require a living being to trigger the release of a bullet, the inherent intention of firearms is to quickly and efficiently kill or wound living flesh. This is what firearms are made for. Exclusively.

Guns aren't scary. Guns aren't cruel. Guns aren't intimidating.

If they're not, then what's the point?

Just about all other retail products regardless of whether they have the potential to be used as a weapon -- cars, knives, baseball bats, axes, chainsaws -- are designed for other purposes. Cars have the capability to kill people, sure, but cars aren't explicitly manufactured to kill or wound us. And, by the way, cars and car owners are heavily regulated by the government at every level, from the municipal level on up. Because firearms are not only cheap and readily available, but also specifically designed to wound or kill, they ought to be regulated accordingly, which, as we all know, Billy and the NRA are against.

Why? Because the NRA is in the business of lobbying for the firearm industry. They're paid to sell more weapons of death, and to prevent laws which might impact gun sales. If you think the NRA is interested in your constitutional rights, you're out of your mind. This entire campaign attempts to make firearms seem more cuddly and acceptable in public, and therefore more marketable, almost like a fashion accessory -- a fashion accessory that could de-brain you in a fraction of a second.

MORE FROM BANTER: Here's Tommy Christopher on Sarah Palin and Fox News Channel's "gun tracking bracelet" lie.