Loading

Banter Voices

The Republicans Are Winning This Round

By · February 28,2013
Print Friendly
| 211 Views | Economics Politics

The Republicans have the upper hand in dealing with the sequester. If 2012 had not happened and their ability to be as incompetentcanarycat as Democrats not been so clear (or if I were a fan of conspiracy theories, which I am NOT), I might think they planned this.  They lost the first few rounds of this tit for tat with the White House on the budget to win when they wanted to.  And their laissez faire attitude towards the whole thing reminds me of Tom Cruise in A Few Good Men when he instructed his team to never look upset or surprised — jut act is if everything was going just as they planned.  They have become the cat who ate the canary.

President Obama, however, seems to have lost his coating of cool.  At least his Administration has.  This is why I think you can tell the GOP is winning.  One could make the same argument about what happens when you call someone Hitler; it means you are losing the argument.  The same can be said of fear mongering.

If you believed some from the Obama Administration, you might expect to wake up tomorrow morning to hoards of locusts.  Education Secretary Arne Duncan, for instance has told multiple news outlets that approximately 40,000 teachers will lose their jobs and that the pink slips are already going out.  Some of that may be true but it doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with the sequester.

If this was just based on who looks calmer, the GOP currently holds the lead.  The cause of their upper hand is another story.  Most Americans just aren’t paying attention.  Several polls indicate they aren’t worried about the cuts because they don’t know about them.  My feeling is that this is a lot like a bad sequel to a bad movie.  This is Police Academy 4.  We’ve been to the brink, we’ve even gone over it and survived.  How is this any different?

And then we come to how they are winning.  First, they are getting spending cuts that they claim they want (they have done nothing to make me think they are more interested in cutting spending than the Democrats).  Secondly, John Boehner said that if we want to prevent the sequester, “the Senate needs to get off of their asses.”  Ouch.  Could that be a dig at Mitch McConnell?

See the Budget Control Act of 2011 http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41965.pdf

  • Christopher Foxx

    Out of curiosity, are the links that appear in your articles automatically put there? I ask because it seems in many of the articles in The Daily Banter, when links appear they go to other articles being referred to or other related info. Not to non-relevant things like Rotten Tomatoes ratings of Tom Cruise or Google results for “White House”.

    • Dennis

      Why wouldn’t you just Google ‘Arne Duncan’ and ’40,000 teachers lose their jobs’ instead of acting like a school-marm nazi scold, Christopher. It’s a lot easier, more productive, and makes you look a lot less arrogant.

      Maybe try that next time as an experiment and see how you feel about yourself. Just as a suggestion.

      • Christopher Foxx

        Who’s scolding, Dennis? I asked whether the links were automatically placed or not. I explained why I could wonder if they were.

        Fact is (and, yes, I know how much you hate those things) most of the articles I’ve seen here have links as I described, and this one didn’t. I’ve seen articles on other sites where “key” words are clearly auto-linked and wondered if that were the case with this posting.

        Can you post any comment where your “gosh, I hate this person so I’m just going to attack them for something they didn’t do and then claim I’m being the reasonable one” BS isn’t obvious?

Most Read Articles Today:

Copyright © 2013 BanterMediaGroup, L.L.C. All rights reserved.