Loading

Banter Voices

Just One Reason Conservatives Are So Strange

By · August 12,2012
Print Friendly
| 1489 Views | Politics

dog-fail-tn

When Barack Obama chose Joe Biden to be his running mate, the least unsurprising thing in the world happened: Republicans went through his record in order to find embarrassing moments, points of conflict with Obama, etc. In other words: opposition research. Now, while I may have disagreed with their characterizations of Biden’s record — I didn’t think they were doing anything extraordinary.

Contrast this with the reactions to progressive opposition research to Sarah Palin and now Paul Ryan. Take Fox News pundit/host Monica Crowley, for example (fun fact: she once accused Obama of lying about being black). She tweets: “Evidence the Left is freaked out re Ryan? Axelrod, DWShultz, Maddow, etc all stumbling & bumbling on the morning shows. Plus, lying.”

I’ve been on the receiving end of similar criticisms from the right since I started writing about the Ryan selection, and it echoes a lot of the same things I heard after Palin’s selection (or as I call it: the greatest days of blogging I’ve ever had). Apparently when the left pulls up information about a Republican candidate — vetting them, if you will — no matter the candidate or the situation, it is a sign that we are supposedly scared of the selection.

Sure, we and all right-minded Americans should be afraid of the visions of America offered by extremists like Ryan and Palin, but as viable political entities there’s no reason to fear them at all. And even if there were, digging into their backgrounds and past statements isn’t evidence of that. It’s evidence of politics at play, nothing more or less.

This bizarre response from the right feels like yet another instance of that movement’s paranoia, insisting despite all evidence that the entire world is always plotting against them. And it gets worse.

Here’s Matthew Continetti of the Free Beacon taking a break from writing Sarah Palin hagiographies to explain how — I kid you not — Barack Obama campaigning is “voter suppression.”

We are therefore witnessing a well-rehearsed and coordinated and almost balletic exercise in voter suppression, as Obama and his helpers spend hundreds of millions of dollars convincing middle America that Romney is a rich elitist who made a fortune in rapacious finance capitalism, and whose concern for the bottom line trumps transparency, compassion, and community.

Here in the real world, this is called “campaigning.” What the Republican party is attempting to do in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania is voter suppression. What their operatives were convicted of in Maryland is voter suppression. What Obama is doing is communicating to the voters about what his opponents plans are for the country.

As someone who repeatedly lamented the impotence of the Democratic Party during the Bush years, it is a marvel to witness the conservative reaction to a Democratic administration that has their act together on many of the basics of politics. Rather than do what the Democrats did under Howard Dean and Barack Obama — get better quickly — Republicans instead have decided that the best thing to do is whine.

Turns out they are the ones who are scared of something.

 

  • db

    Phlunk,

    Yours from Sunday morning:

    “Hahaha. Here we go again. Another liberal trying to be taken seriously by saying he’d consider voting for a Republican.”

    I’ll give you that 90% of our readers would have been too young to vote (21 at the time); but an election between an “anti-war” George Romney (R) & a “pro-war”, say, Henry Jackson” (D) might have had a number of our colleagues pulling the “R” lever. Though indeed those were much different times.

    You react to labels better (worse?) than just about anyone I know of. The label does not make the issue.

  • M2

    Wow, that’s a thriller, Dennis. Yes, everyone secretly loves Paul Ryan, we’re all just too afraid to say it.

    Yuh huh.

    • Wilbur

      Oh noes. Dennis has found tape of democrats being courteous to Paul Ryan. What can we do??

      Talk about desperation!

      Dennis, I know that for you it’s a really big deal when people are nice to you since it happens so infrequently, but among normal people it really doesn’t signify that much.

  • Plunket

    Former Clinton Chief of Staff on Paul Ryan:

    Video shows Erskine Bowles once praised Paul Ryan and his budget

    <blockquote""I'm telling you, this guy is amazing," Bowles says of Ryan. "I always thought I was OK with arithmetic, this guy can run circles around me."

    "The budget he came forward with is just like Paul Ryan," he continued. “It is a sensible, straightforward, honest, serious budget …”

    Whoa.

    No wonder Clinton asked Ryan to call him.

  • Plunket

    M2 sounds like he’s freaking out.

    A liberal talking trash on a liberal blog…just what winners do.

    #ObamaIsWinning

    Meanwhile, remember this exchange from Bill Clinton to Paul Ryan:

    Hey, I just met you, and this is crazy, but here’s my number, so call me maybe?

    “CLINTON: So anyway, I said I’m glad we won this race in New York. But I hope Democrats don’t use this as an excuse to do nothing.”

    Guess what, President Clinton. That’s exactly what they did.

    • M2

      When you start making sense, you let me know. Until then, keep shaking that fist at the clouds, old man.

  • M2

    And for those who need a laugh, this is astoundingly unintentionally funny.

    Did you know Mitt and Ben finish each others sentences? So adorable.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/13/romney-brilliant-foreign-policy-choice/?cmpid=GoogleNewsEditorsPicks&google_editors_picks=true

  • M2

    In 2004, Continetti and co. called Kerry rich and out of touch. in 2012, they’re out to convince us that that their candidate has a lot in common with the average American even though he’s even richer than Kerry (however slight the edge in worth may be).

    Good luck with that. Reap what you sow, my GOP friends.

  • enlightened liberal

    Hey, the least I can do since the links you post prove the opposite of your points.

  • Wilbur

    Beneath the thin skin of every bully is a crybaby waiting to get out.

    • db

      Wil,

      Several threads back one of the trolls mentioned that you always had my back. He meant it as an insult. I accept it with thanks. It’s good to know that you-all are looking out for me when I’m not around.

      • Wilbur

        Least I could do db, we anti-American commie atheist faggot surrender monkeys have to stick together.

  • Zython

    Monica Crowley

    Yeesh. Saw her on The McLaughlin Group, and she was easily the most xenophobic and had the least nuanced foreign policy of anyone in the room.

    And Pat Buchanan was there.

    As for your main point, O. Conservatives have repeatedly espoused the idea that Democracy is when the guy you like is in power. That’s why they consider dictators they like (Pinochet, Mubarak, etc) to be the will of the people, and democratically-elected governments they don’t like to be illegitimate.

    • db

      Or Communist. It’s an easy label to slap on anyone of whom you don’t approve.

      OW,

      Remember our resident trolls are on record claiming that President Obama will lose as completely as President Carter 30 some years ago. They need to find support for that position.

      Equally remember the word games they play. If you can define campaigning as “voter suppression” then not only do you blacken the opposition, you also minimize the real attempts at suppression the “Voter ID” laws.

  • enlightened liberal

    Opposition Researching a Democrats birth certificate and how he got into college: Pure, unadulterated racism.

    Opposition Researching a Republicans tax returns, which his father started the precedent of providing: A reasonable request.

    • SaveFarris

      EL: always ready to prove my point.

      Don’t ever change.

      • Christopher Foxx

        Farris: always ready to parade his stupidity.

        Please change.

  • SaveFarris

    Opposition Researching a Republican: the greatest aspiration a Journalist can subscribe to.

    Opposition Researching a Democrat: Pure, unadulterated racism!

    • Wilbur

      Opposition researching a Democrat and then lying about what that research finds: G.O.P. S.O.P.!

      • Wilbur

        Case in point. In case you thought that in order to thank the Lord for giving him such a dishy ticket-mate, Romney might have given up lying, here he is lying again

        That’s who he is. That’s who they are. That’s what they do.

        • Plunket

          Wilbur goes to a Romney rally, is politely told what rally he should be at….

          “Mr. President, take your campaign out of the gutter.”

          From Greek columns to the gutter in four short years….. “Obama is winning!”.

          America loses.

          • Wilbur

            Serial prevaricator Mitt tells Obama to get out of the gutter (presumably because there’s only room in the gutter for one)… Dennis does what Dennis does.</a.

        • SaveFarris

          From your link: The Affordable Care Act does reduce Medicare spending by $500 billion over the next 10 years.

          Game Over.

          By the way, this was my favorite part: About $220 billion comes from reducing annual increases in Medicare payments to health care providers. aka the “Doc Fix” which means those cuts will never, ever, ever happen. Because if they do, no doctor would ever agree to provide services for those reduced fees and voila: Medicare as we know it ends. Immediately. For everyone.

          Heck of a plan, Barack

          • Wilbur

            The Affordable Care Act does reduce Medicare spending by $500 billion over the next 10 years.

            And how does that sentence end, Farris?

            …Those dollars aren’t taken out of the current budget, they are not actual cuts, and nowhere does the bill actually eliminate any current benefits.

            Not only are you the master of look-over-there and the throw-a-link-up-and-hope-they-don’t-click-it, you are now branching off into deceptively selective quotation. Bravo, sir.

  • Plunket

    George was an honorable man, someone who I would consider voting for.

    Hahaha. Here we go again. Another liberal trying to be taken seriously by saying he’d consider voting for a Republican.

    Every time they say it, it’s always used as a reason to bash the current guy. Every time.

    Why do liberals concern-troll on their own blogs?

    Just one reason they’re so strange.

  • enlightened liberal

    WHAR TAX RETURNS WHAR???? There must be some really damning stuff there for Romney not to release them. He could stop Harry Reid’s speculation by releasing them, but why doesn’t he? Harry Reid’s Bain source must be telling the truth!

    George Romney must be turning over in his grave, seeing his son disavow everything of principle that George stood for. As we know, George was the person who started the precedent of presenting tax returns. He also turned down a large bonus, something his son would NEVER do. George was an honorable man, someone who I would consider voting for. His son? Not so much.

Most Read Articles Today:

Copyright © 2013 BanterMediaGroup, L.L.C. All rights reserved.