Guest Contributor on August 06, 2012
FILED TO: Media and Entertainment
Issue 15 of the Banter Magazine is now out! Right now, you can try a membership for only 99 cents!
In a word: No.
In two words: Clearly not.
In more words: While he does describe the Sikhs as “unfairly targeted” I don’t see that he’s thereby suggesting that he thinks Muslims are fair game. What should he have said instead? “Incorrectly targeted”? “Mistakenly targeted”? If one wanted to they could wring out an interpretation from either of those that he’s saying it’s correct or not a mistake to target Muslims.
Based on what I’ve read elsewhere, the current understanding is that the killer was probably mad at Muslims and didn’t realize that the Sikhs were someone different. Clearly the speaker is trying to communicate that and used “unfairly” to do so. I think one needs to be looking for something to see it as an endorsement of attacks on Muslims.
Banter Members login here!
Banter M Issue 15: The Rise of The Human Politician, Trump’s Southern Strategy and To Live and Die Apathetically in L.A.
Banter M Issue 14: Life, Death and TV News, Cornel West’s Danger to Bernie Sanders and How Alex Jones Exploits His Audience
Banter M Issue 13: Better Living Through Ecstasy, Trump’s Racist Immigration Plan and the Politics of Oppression
Banter M Issue 12: Stop Buying Crap, Ben Carson’s Big Problem and Losing It
Banter M Issue 11: Jon Stewart’s Departure Will Hurt America, Being an Entrepreneur Sucks, and The Outsider
The Reason Why White House Support for Joe Biden Presidential Bid is Not News
White House ‘Straight Outta Compton’ Iran Deal Tweet Was Stupid, But So What?
White House Slams Fox News Over ‘Impartiality’ In Planned Parenthood Story
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!