Guest Contributor on August 06, 2012
FILED TO: Media and Entertainment
Issue 10 of the Banter Magazine is now out! Right now, you can try a membership for only 99 cents!
In a word: No.
In two words: Clearly not.
In more words: While he does describe the Sikhs as “unfairly targeted” I don’t see that he’s thereby suggesting that he thinks Muslims are fair game. What should he have said instead? “Incorrectly targeted”? “Mistakenly targeted”? If one wanted to they could wring out an interpretation from either of those that he’s saying it’s correct or not a mistake to target Muslims.
Based on what I’ve read elsewhere, the current understanding is that the killer was probably mad at Muslims and didn’t realize that the Sikhs were someone different. Clearly the speaker is trying to communicate that and used “unfairly” to do so. I think one needs to be looking for something to see it as an endorsement of attacks on Muslims.
Banter Members login here!
Banter M Issue 10: If I Was Black I Would Leave America, Lion Hunter Karma, and Seven Years
Banter M Issue 9: The Dan Bidondi Special, Disaster Porn and Earthquake Irrationality
Banter M Issue 8: Return to Bloom County, It’s Not Your Fault and Scott Walker is Not Sexy
Banter M Issue 7: Why We Must Fight Austerity, Don’t Read This Article, and Flavortown Continued
Banter M Issue 6: Welcome to Flavortown, LGBT Appropriation and a Tribute to a Rock Legend
White House Slams Fox News Over ‘Impartiality’ In Planned Parenthood Story
The White House Mocks ‘International Man of Mystery’ Tom Cotton Over Iran Side-Deals
Obama Blasts Huckabee and Trump Over ‘Marching Israelis to the Door of the Oven’ Remark
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK!