Guest Contributor on August 06, 2012
In a word: No.
In two words: Clearly not.
In more words: While he does describe the Sikhs as “unfairly targeted” I don’t see that he’s thereby suggesting that he thinks Muslims are fair game. What should he have said instead? “Incorrectly targeted”? “Mistakenly targeted”? If one wanted to they could wring out an interpretation from either of those that he’s saying it’s correct or not a mistake to target Muslims.
Based on what I’ve read elsewhere, the current understanding is that the killer was probably mad at Muslims and didn’t realize that the Sikhs were someone different. Clearly the speaker is trying to communicate that and used “unfairly” to do so. I think one needs to be looking for something to see it as an endorsement of attacks on Muslims.
MEMBERS ONLY: Budweiser Tastes Like Beer. What the Hell Else Do You Want?
MEMBERS ONLY: Why The Biggest Fight in Boxing History Still Has Not Happened
The Ferguson Grand Jury Was Set Up To Fail and So It Did
MEMBERS ONLY: President Obama’s Executive Action On Immigration Is Legal, Popular, And Troubling
MEMBERS ONLY: The Daily Banter Video Mail Bag VERY NSFW Edition
The Daily Banter Video Mail Bag: the Bill Cosby Allegations and Hanging Out With George Bush!
President Obama’s Thanksgiving Menu Includes 6 Pies And Maybe An Ebola Vaccine
There’s No Way President Obama Could’ve Smoked a Cigarette With Billy Joel