Guest Contributor on August 06, 2012
FILED TO: Media and Entertainment
In a word: No.
In two words: Clearly not.
In more words: While he does describe the Sikhs as “unfairly targeted” I don’t see that he’s thereby suggesting that he thinks Muslims are fair game. What should he have said instead? “Incorrectly targeted”? “Mistakenly targeted”? If one wanted to they could wring out an interpretation from either of those that he’s saying it’s correct or not a mistake to target Muslims.
Based on what I’ve read elsewhere, the current understanding is that the killer was probably mad at Muslims and didn’t realize that the Sikhs were someone different. Clearly the speaker is trying to communicate that and used “unfairly” to do so. I think one needs to be looking for something to see it as an endorsement of attacks on Muslims.
MEMBERS ONLY: Why You Should Still Be Listening To New Music After 33
MEMBERS ONLY: The After Party Podcast: Bob and Chez Discuss The Avengers, Joss Whedon, Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon
MEMBERS ONLY: How To Reappear Completely
MEMBERS ONLY: The White House Protects State (Dinner) Secrets and An American Hero Burns Himself
Banter Members login here!
White House Correspondents’ Association Looks To the Future
White House Rebukes John McCain, Stands By ‘Hair On Fire’ Comment
White House Takes Questions From Cuba National Television Reporter