Guest Contributor on August 06, 2012
Thousands of people have signed up for the Banter Newsletter. Have you?
December 19th, 2014
In a word: No.
In two words: Clearly not.
In more words: While he does describe the Sikhs as “unfairly targeted” I don’t see that he’s thereby suggesting that he thinks Muslims are fair game. What should he have said instead? “Incorrectly targeted”? “Mistakenly targeted”? If one wanted to they could wring out an interpretation from either of those that he’s saying it’s correct or not a mistake to target Muslims.
Based on what I’ve read elsewhere, the current understanding is that the killer was probably mad at Muslims and didn’t realize that the Sikhs were someone different. Clearly the speaker is trying to communicate that and used “unfairly” to do so. I think one needs to be looking for something to see it as an endorsement of attacks on Muslims.
MEMBERS ONLY: ‘Redefining Beauty’ Is a Great Idea Until You Actually Think About What It Means
MEMBERS ONLY: The U.S./Cuba Thaw Marks the End of Cuban Exile Hardliners’ Political Power
MEMBERS ONLY: The End of “Stephen Colbert” and the Beginning of Stephen Colbert
MEMBERS ONLY: 5 White House Reporters Who Like To Stir the Pot At Daily Briefings
MEMBERS ONLY: A Martial Artist’s Perspective on Eric Garner’s Death by Chokehold
The Daily Banter NSFW Video Mail Bag
The Daily Banter Video Mail Bag: Ben, Chez and Bob Discuss Cuba, Greenwald, Florida and Hippies!
Upbeat President Obama Skips ‘Naughty’ TV Reporters In Year-End Press Conference
Did Emperor Obama Really Lie About Not Using Executive Actions?
Fox News Thinks ‘The Interview’ Flap Is Obama’s Fault
President Obama Talks About Racism And That Time He Was Mistaken For A Waiter
The Sony Hacker Terrorists Did Not ‘Win’