Banter on the Banter - Obama's Message to Iran

Avatar:
Ben Cohen
Author:
Publish date:
Social count:
0

By Ben Cohen

Nana Ampofo (a contributor at the Banter) writes about my negative post on Obama's message to Iran:

This


doesn't seem fair to me. First, much of politics is symbolism and


rhetoric. Ahmadinejad sent a letter of congratulations to Obama upon


his election victory but made no policy changes. Still that was not a


vacuous act. Obama's message stands in sharp contrast with the "war on


terror", "with us or against us", "axis of evil" type rhetoric of the


past eight years. A welcome change, I believe. It creates room for


negotiation, be it between the US and Iran, or the US and Russia on the


subject of Iran. Second, the Obama administration is still forming


policy. He only came into office in January. I think we should see the


Nowruz message as part of a process rather than the sum total of


Obama's Iran policy.

I sincerely hope Nana is correct, although I just didn't think it was enough. I'm worried Obama will try to be too hawkish on foreign policy (witness the increased troop presence in Afghanistan and Pakistan), and end up in another giant quagmire worse than he inherited. Iran will be key to an effective strategy in the Middle East, so I think bigger gestures will be needed.